![]()
A tent fire nearly took Ernesto Akothe's life while he slept beside his girlfriend in the Harrah woods, melting plastic onto his back and forcing him to tear a hole in the fabric to escape. Two years later, a Pottawatomie County judge wiped away more than $25,000 in court fines and fees that had kept him from rebuilding, part of $97,233 forgiven for ten defendants that same day.
Akothe had been without stable housing for over a decade before the fire. He took it as a sign to change his life, completing drug treatment, joining a church, picking up odd jobs and buying a fixer-upper trailer. But his old convictions for driving with a suspended license and drug possession left him with court debt he had no way to pay. Few employers will hire someone with a record, he said, and that debt kept him locked out of a better future even after he'd done the work to turn his life around.
![]()
When Akothe walked into the Pottawatomie County courthouse last November, he expected to be arrested. Defendants in Oklahoma used to be jailed routinely for failing to pay fines and fees, and he thought this hearing would end the same way. Instead, attorney Ed Wunch of Legal Aid Services of Oklahoma helped him fill out paperwork showing he earned below 150% of the Federal Poverty Level. Within an hour, the judge cleared his debt completely.
That outcome exists because of House Bill 2259, a 2023 state law requiring judges to weigh a defendant's ability to pay before piling on fines and fees. If someone qualifies through income level or benefits like food stamps, the law says a judge must reduce or eliminate the debt. But as The Frontier and KOSU have reported, that requirement isn't being applied the same way everywhere. In Oklahoma County, Special District Judge April Collins denied a similar request, questioning whether the law itself was constitutional, and judges there have paused all fine and fee waivers while that case is appealed. Wunch put it plainly: the law should mean the same deal no matter the county, and right now it doesn't.
What I'd tell a client about this
The lesson here isn't really about court debt. It's about how much energy gets eaten up by an old obligation that never gets reexamined. Akothe did everything right after the fire. He got clean, found a church, started working. None of it mattered to his bank account or his job prospects until someone actually sat down, checked the facts of his situation and applied a rule that was already on the books. I tell clients something similar all the time: whatever debt or obligation feels permanent in your life, whether it's financial, professional or personal, go back and check whether the rules around it have actually changed. Don't assume the weight you've been carrying for years still applies the same way today.
One thing to do this week
Pick one bill, debt or obligation you've been assuming is fixed and unmovable. Spend fifteen minutes this week checking if there's a program, a form or a policy change you haven't looked into. Akothe's break came from a form Legal Aid handed him in a side room, not from a lawyer he hired. Sometimes the relief is already sitting there waiting for someone to ask the right question.
Akothe is now married to Krystal Jones, the woman who was beside him the night of the fire, and he's working with a friend to clear his criminal record so he can find steadier work and take a mission trip. He hopes to eventually open a sober living house in McCloud. His wife summed up what made the difference for them: if you want someone to change, you help them change. That's the part worth sitting with, whether you're the one carrying the debt or the one with the power to forgive it.
Our last article on this: Turning 50 Could Be the Best Career Move You Never Planned